This deliverable outlines the structure, requirements, and specifications of the CyberSecPro
education and training programme. The main findings of this deliverable are as follows:
By addressing these key findings, the CyberSecPro education and training programme can be
designed and implemented effectively, providing a comprehensive and relevant training
experience for participants while overcoming any potential challenges
The CyberSecPro cybersecurity certification schema proposal acknowledges the
certification scheme unavailability of professional cybersecurity trainings, as well as the absence of a
European Authority for approving both the trainings and the organisations which perform them. On
these grounds, the manuscript sheds light on the certification landscape regarding relevant organisations
and bodies in international and European level. Then, the standards, the criteria, and the processes
regarding professional certifications are thoroughly discussed and assessed. The manuscript concludes
with a proposal of three schemes which namely are:
The deliverable reflects the Task 3.3 outcomes.
The CyberSecPro (CSP) Deliverable D3.4 corresponds to the outcomes of T3.5 regarding the “Energy Specific Curricula” with deadline for Month 18. The proposal of this deliverable is to provide a comprehensive cybersecurity programme portfolio targeted to the energy sector and focused on intensifying knowledge and practical skills in line with the current security challenges facing the sector.
Likewise, this deliverable also exposes the methodological process carried out in T3.5. It deals with aligning the syllabi of the 12 CPS generic training modules defined in D3.1 to the particularities of the energy scenarios, adapting and parametrising relevant inputs contemplated in the D3.1 templates to specific use cases and applications. The resulting parametrisation is widely outlined throughout this document, where the Cyber Security Body of Knowledge (CyBoK) framework has continued to be a
reference for the process of integration and adaptation of topics, facilitating the completeness of content.
Additionally, this process is also attributed to the intensive collaboration of the CSP partners who have demonstrated expertise and competencies in the fields of cybersecurity, energy and education. All of this experience, combined with a methodology for aligning with previous works, have certainly helped
to establish the 12 CPS sector-specific training modules in the form of courses, seminars, practical exercises, workshops, summer schools, etc. with the final proposal to showcase its value proposition for the operational phase.
This deliverable presents the outcomes of T4.3 up to the conclusion of CyberSecPro in Month 39 (February 2026). Hence, it comprehensively records all CSP modules corresponding to the capability category Cybersecurity Principle and Management implemented by the end of February 2026. The document presents quantitative information on hosting site, learners enrolled, background of learners, evaluation forms of learners, evaluation forms of trainers, income, scholarship/sponsorships, training levels, delivery formats, and sectoral coverage across energy, health, maritime, and general cybersecurity domains. The deliverable includes descriptive analysis of training deployment, illustrating implementation patterns and participation across different module categories and sectors. Moreover, it describes the context of the documentation task and the documentation methodology including the definition of a record comprising the relevant information per module.
This deliverable presents the outcomes of Task T4.4 up to the conclusion of CyberSecPro in Month 39 (February 2026). Accordingly, it comprehensively records all CSP modules corresponding to the capability category “Cybersecurity Tools and Technologies” implemented by the end of February 2026. The document provides quantitative information on the hosting site, learner enrolments, learner background, trainee evaluation forms, trainer evaluation forms, income, scholarships/sponsorships, training levels, delivery formats, and sectoral coverage across energy, health, maritime, and general cybersecurity domains. The deliverable includes descriptive analysis of training deployment, illustrating implementation patterns and participation across different module categories and sectors. Finally, it describes the context of the documentation task and the documentation methodology, including the definition of a record comprising the relevant information per module.
This deliverable reports on the implementation of training modules on emerging technologies developed within the CyberSecPro (CSP) project under Task T4.5 about “Operating the training modules on emerging technologies”. It provides a consolidated overview of CSP modules implementation addressing cybersecurity in emerging digital technologies, critical infrastructure security, and software security. The document provides quantitative data on hosting sites, learner enrolment, backgrounds, learners and trainer evaluations, income, scholarships, training levels, delivery methods, and sector coverage in energy, health, maritime, and cybersecurity fields. It offers a comprehensive overview of training program metrics and sectoral focus areas. The deliverable includes an initial descriptive analysis of training deployment, illustrating implementation patterns and participation across different module categories and sectors. Overall, the document serves as evidence of the effective deployment and reach of the CyberSecPro training programme on emerging technologies and supports the assessment of progress toward the project’s capacity-building and skills development objectives.
This deliverable presents the outcomes of T4.6 up to the conclusion of CyberSecPro in Month 39 (February 2026). Hence, it comprehensively records all CSP modules corresponding to the capability category Cybersecurity Offensive Practices implemented by the end of February 2026. The document presents quantitative information on hosting site, learners enrolled, background of learners, evaluation forms of learners, evaluation forms of trainers, income, scholarship/sponsorships, training levels, delivery formats, and sectoral coverage across energy, health, maritime, and general cybersecurity domains. The deliverable includes an initial descriptive analysis of training deployment, illustrating implementation patterns and participation across different module categories and sectors. Moreover, it describes the context of the documentation task and the documentation methodology including the definition of a record comprising the relevant information per module.
CyberSecPro (D5.1) details the evaluation methodology developed to assess satisfaction levels among trainers and trainees, as well as to evaluate MOOCs and training materials through peer-review processes. Unlike earlier surveys within the project, this approach is purpose-driven and tailored to capture experiential feedback rather than technical competencies. The report outlines the tools and strategies used for collecting and analysing both quantitative and qualitative data, emphasising user satisfaction, content relevance, and perceived effectiveness. By distinguishing its objectives from previous assessments, D5.1 establishes a nuanced framework that supports continuous improvement through stakeholder-driven insights. Recommendations also guide future analysis and data use to ensure CyberSecPro’s training activities remain engaging, relevant, and aligned with participant expectations across the EU cybersecurity education landscape.
This deliverable reports the results of the evaluation of CyberSecPro’s training modules and the identification of best practices that support effective cybersecurity education across Europe. Building on the evaluation framework established in D5.1, this deliverable assesses learner satisfaction, training effectiveness, practical relevance, and alignment with workforce needs, and synthesises the practices that have proven most successful across consortium training activities.
The CyberSecPro project identified the lack of a unified European certification framework for professional cybersecurity training, resulting in fragmented, non-interoperable programmes with limited mutual recognition. This issue is particularly acute in sector-specific contexts, where rapid digitalisation contrasts with low cybersecurity maturity and inconsistent skill development, restricting cross-sector mobility. The project proposes a structured certification schema comprising modular training aligned with defined competencies and subject to higher-level recognition, such as by the ECCC. The sector-specific professional training scheme integrates theoretical and practical learning, maps micro-credentials to ECTS credits, aligns with ECSF profiles and competences, and offers trainees up to 60 ECTS credits.
This deliverable (D6.2) reports on the dissemination and communication activities implemented within the CyberSecPro project up to Month 38 (M38). It presents the key communication assets (visual identity, templates and marketing materials, and the admin platform), the channels and formats used to reach target audiences, and performance against the Grant Agreement KPIs.
This deliverable defines the exploitation, sustainability, and business framework for the CyberSecPro project beyond its funded duration under the DIGITAL-2021-SKILLS-01 programme. It consolidates the project’s four Key Exploitable Results (KERs), sector-specific cybersecurity training modules, structured MOOC pathways, the Moodle-based Dynamic Curriculum Management (DCM) platform and a certification-oriented skills validation approach aligned with the European Cybersecurity Skills Framework (ECSF). The document presents a structured exploitation model based on three progressive deployment scenarios. The deliverable integrates market positioning, competitive analysis, business modelling logic, and indicative financial envelopes to define the operational conditions required for sustainable post-project continuation. The financial analysis focuses on minimum operational sustainability thresholds rather than speculative growth projections. Long-term sustainability is framed around institutional adoption, governance clarity, structured content maintenance, and defined operational responsibilities. The document provides a decision-support framework enabling the consortium to determine the most appropriate continuation model after project closure.
This deliverable presents the group exploitation plans of the CyberSecPro project, documenting how the consortium translates its key exploitable results (KERs) into coordinated, multi- partner pathways for post-project continuation and impact. Building on a structured methodology from KERs to exploitation pathways to action-oriented plans, the report consolidates group-level exploitation options across education, open access/public impact, industry and professional training, community building, and commercialisation. It then develops detailed group exploitation plans for three priority pathways: (1) development of (joint) master programmes, (2) public availability of training materials as OER, and (3) research & development follow-on activities.
This deliverable consolidates the individual exploitation plans of CyberSecPro partners, documenting how organisations are integrating and sustaining key exploitable result 1 (KER1; the modular training portfolio) beyond the funding period. It presents a comparable, partner-by-partner view of baseline educational offers and the concrete pathways through which CyberSecPro outputs are being embedded into university curricula and company training catalogues to generate long-term value for learners and labour-market stakeholders.
Cybersecurity Incident Responders play a critical role in defending organizations by handling and mitigating cyber incidents. Multiple national and international skills frameworks define this role, each outlining the Incident Responder’s mission, key tasks, required skills/abilities, and knowledge. In this analysis, we compare how the Incident Responder role is characterized across eight frameworks.
Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or HADEA. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.
Project Agreement no. 101083594